UEFA Europa League
UTC+8 2026-03-13 04:00
Final Result: 1-0 (H)
Status
Match Finished
90'
Venue
Cegeka Arena · Genk
UEFA Europa League · 2025
Standings
#9
Samples 8
Season Record
5-1-2
Home/Away 11/7
Recent Form
Recent Matches
-
Injuries
No published injury data
Standings
#7
Samples 8
Season Record
5-2-1
Home/Away 10/4
Recent Form
Recent Matches
-
Injuries
No published injury data
Home
2.55
EV -15.72%
Draw
3.20
EV +13.01%
Away
2.88
EV -8.89%
Line: 0.00 ·Home 1.88 ·Away 1.92
AH +0: push possible on exact handicap margin.
Line 1.5 · O1.5
Over: 71.1% (2.20) · EV +56.51%
Under: 28.9% (1.62) · EV -53.25%
Confidence: 4.6/10
Line 2.5 · U2.5
Over: 45.5% (5.00) · EV +127.28%
Under: 54.5% (1.17) · EV -36.18%
Confidence: 3.7/10
主概率33%;优势差2%;与市场主方向一致
历史回测
Updated: 2026-03-25 18:41
Genk hosts SC Freiburg in a finely balanced Europa League clash, according to both statistical models and market odds. Our model gives Genk a slight edge with a 33.0% probability of winning, marginally ahead of Freiburg's 31.6% chance, while a draw is considered the most likely outcome at 35.3%. Analyzing the 1X2 market, the odds reflect this uncertainty, with Genk at 2.55, the draw at 3.20, and Freiburg at 2.88.
Expected value analysis reveals that backing a draw offers the most value at 13.013. The relatively close probabilities assigned to each outcome, coupled with the market odds, make the draw an attractive option for value-seeking bettors. Conversely, backing either Genk or Freiburg to win presents negative expected value, suggesting that the market has already priced in the likelihood of their victories.
Despite the balanced probabilities, our model's confidence in the 1X2 market is low, scoring only 20.041. This indicates that while the draw represents the best value proposition, significant uncertainty remains regarding the match outcome. Several factors could contribute to this uncertainty, including team form, injury updates, and tactical approaches.
Interestingly, our model strongly recommends exploring the "Both Teams To Score" (BTTS) market. With an exceptionally high expected value of 153.854, backing both teams to find the net emerges as the most compelling betting opportunity. The rationale for this recommendation stems from historical backtesting data, suggesting a strong tendency for matches with similar characteristics to result in both teams scoring.
The model's reasoning for favoring the BTTS market is further supported by looking at the 1X2 probabilities. The home win probability stands at 33%, with only a 2% difference in the win probabilities, broadly aligning with the market's expectation that Genk has a slight advantage, but this does not take into account the attacking capabilities of both sides. Combining this with the model backtesting provides a high confidence value selection in the BTTS market.
Given the data, a cautious approach is advisable for this match. While the draw offers the best value in the 1X2 market, the low confidence score suggests a degree of unpredictability. The most appealing selection is "Both Teams To Score", which provides a high expected value based on the model's analysis. Bettors should consider the potential for an open game in which both teams contribute to the scoreline.
Updated: 2026-04-05 23:00